You don’t need to be a lefty to think the NHS reforms are mad

Tim Montgomerie has, this morning, proved what I’ve been saying for months; you don’t need to be a lefty to think that the NHS reforms are unnecessary and counterproductive. He’s changed his tune since this time last year but he’s right about this:

Most observers think that meeting “The Nicholson challenge” – £20 billion of essential efficiency savings – was always going to be nightmarishly difficult but that it didn’t require new legislation. Nearly all of the necessary efficiencies could have been delivered with existing powers. That has certainly been the consistent argument of Stephen Dorrell MP, the influential Chairman of the Commons Health Select Committee.

Of all the Coalition’s ideas, its plans for the NHS are the craziest of the lot. I’m prepared to consider the remote possibility that expansionary fiscal contraction might work in the end. It may be that, through some kind of alchemy involving social enterprises, localism, devolution and the Big Society, council services can be made more efficient, though I doubt whether, at the same time, they will become more effective. But I’m as certain as anyone can be that there is no way the government’s NHS plans will do anything other than simultaneously make the service more expensive and screw it up.

The week after the proposals were published, my back-of-a-fag-packet guess, based on figures from those well-known left-wingers, Civitas and Manchester Business School, was that, even if everything went to plan, it would take until the second half of this decade for the NHS to return to its current levels of productivity and for the reorganisation to pay for itself. That’s before factoring in the £20bn savings demanded by the Nicholson Challenge.

People who know more about it than I do can argue about whether Andrew Lansley’s bill will lead to the creeping privatisation of the NHS or whether exposing the service to EU competition law will lead to a market free-for-all and the dismemberment of the service. Opinion is divided on this, to say the least.

However, after two decades of studying, reading about and doing corporate reorganisations, I can say with confidence that a root and branch reform of an organisation as complex as the NHS cannot be done at the same time as achieving 4 percent efficiency savings and maintaining current levels of service. At least one of the three, and most probably two of the three, will have to give. My money would be on service levels and efficiency savings taking second and third places to the restructure.

As I said last year, 4 percent per year is a tall order even for service organisations that are used to making efficiency improvements. Pile a major restructure on top and your chances of achieving them are even slimmer. And so it has proved.

Perhaps, now that warnings against the reforms from the right are getting louder, the government might reconsider, though a lot of the damage has already been done. Whether David Cameron will kill the bill depends on a political calculation; will it be more damaging to do a massive u-turn or to wreck what most people still think of as one of the great achievements of the post-war years? Early signs, though, suggest that the Conservatives will stick with it.

Hopefully, wiser heads will prevail. Every government is allowed one humiliating volte-face and, of all its policies, this is the one that the Coalition should dump. The NHS reforms are bonkers. They will cost a bomb and achieve nothing. It’s not just left-wingers and NHS insiders telling the government that they won’t work. When even its own supporters think that it is about to severely damage the health service, surely it’s time for the government to change its mind.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to You don’t need to be a lefty to think the NHS reforms are mad

  1. Pingback: You don’t need to be a lefty to think the NHS reforms are mad - Rick - Member Blogs - HR Blogs - HR Space from Personnel Today and Xpert HR

  2. Daniel says:

    I think Dr. Ben Goldacre said it best with his five tweets the other day.

    1) In case u don’t understand NHS bill: GPs know they’re being set up to fail by being given commissioning powers. Those are specialist skills.
    2) After GPs fail, private commissioning expertise will be needed: large private corps, which will come to operate like health insurers.
    3) These large bodies, like public/private insurance co’s, will be able to pick & choose patients. Note no geographical responsibility in bill
    4) Small differences will emerge in what services they offer. Top up plans will become available. And that, kids, will be that.
    5) It is so very obvious that GPs are being set up to fail at the specialist task of health service planning that it’s clearly not an accident

    Those last 5 tweets are what will obviously, predictably, happen to the NHS after this bill. If you missed them, they were a bit important.
    Taken from, http://bengoldacre.posterous.com/what-will-happen-with-the-nhs-bill-in-5-tweet

  3. Prateek Buch says:

    Absolutely spot on. There’s a heck of a lot of hyperbole surrounding the extension of the market into the NHS (in truth a lot of the reforms are logical extensions of those begun by Labour), but one thing’s for sure – this top-down reorganisation (in the words of the Coalition Agreement in promising no such thing would occur…) coming at the same time as necessary efficiency savings is simply unworkable.

    John Pugh MP compares it to turning around an oil tanker at the same time as dismantling its rudder…

  4. Nora says:

    I’m as certain as everyone else concurring with the sentiments here – the reforms are not going to achieve what we are told they are intended to achieve. I believe the process of dismantling the NHS behemoth has already begun – it was perhaps allowed to do this because private interests were alllowed to operate within it right from the beginning.
    Being part of the EU totally undermines the stated aims and funding structure of the NHS as it was intended to operate. Free movement of people within Europe has enormous costs to us all – I am yet to be convinced that the so called benefits justify the costs that we all bear just to be able to have a frontierless Europe.
    The NHS has managed to make some account book savings – to the patients’ cost. The costs borne by patients in accessing ‘free’ healthcare is always hidden. Rick Wakeman on R4 News Quiz put his finger on the issue – if you have an accident you have to have a separate appointment for each of your wounds. His tongue may have been in his cheek, but my experience of the service suggests that he is not far from the truth. The proposed reforms will not improve anything other than the balance sheets of the privately run vested interests who will charge in on their grey donkeys, lances waving uselessly in the air.

  5. Jim says:

    Simple. Just let people leave the NHS and take their share of the cash with them, to spend as they see fit, on private health care, or wine women and song.

    After all if the NHS is so wonderful, no-one could possibly want to leave its tender mercies could they?

  6. Pingback: The NHS: WTF do I say? « Left Outside

  7. Reblogged this on Citizens, not serfs and commented:
    2012 – and so it comes to pass.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s