NHS on course to run out of money by 2020

David Cameron keeps promising to maintain the ring-fence on NHS spending. Not a penny of the NHS budget will be cut, he said again last month. The trouble is, even that doesn’t look like it will be enough. According to studies by the Kings Fund, health costs increase somewhere between 3 and 6 percent faster than inflation. Rising costs and demand mean that the NHS needs real-terms budget increases just to stand still. NHS England forecasts that the service will need another £30bn per year by 2020.

In its recent Green Budget, the Institute for Fiscal Studies looked at how productivity improvements might reduce the need for extra funding.

Screen Shot 2015-02-06 at 17.15.15

Relatively modest sounding productivity increases of 1.5 percent would halve the amount of extra funding needed. More ambitious ones might even reduce it by around three-quarters. 

The trouble is, the NHS has never been able to make consistent year-on-year productivity improvements. According to figures released by the ONS on Friday, while there has been the odd jump in health service productivity, it has usually been followed by a slowdown or even a fall. The record 3.5 percent jump in 2011 was followed by 0.9 percent in 2012.

Screen Shot 2015-02-06 at 15.41.32Steady productivity improvements are more difficult to achieve than one offs. A sudden cut in funding creates a sense of crisis and people respond well to crises. It’s much easier to manage people when there is an all-hands-to-the-pumps emergency than during the day-to-day slog of steady-state. The NHS handles emergencies well. That’s one of its main purposes and it attracts the sort of people who work well in situations of extreme urgency. I wasn’t at all surprised that the Royal Marsden re-opened less than a week after a fire and full evacuation. I’m also not surprised that the NHS is plagued by project failures. It does emergencies well and the humdrum less so. The NHS’s history of heroic productivity improvements followed by nothing the following year is entirely consistent with its culture.

As if the task of improving health service productivity wasn’t hard enough, the government’s reorganisation seems to have made things worse. A review of the reforms published last week by the King’s Fund was damning.

The first half of the 2010–15 parliament was taken up with debate on the Health and Social Care Bill, the biggest and most far-reaching legislation in the history of the NHS. The second half of the parliament was devoted to limiting the damage caused by the Bill and dealing with the effects of growing financial and service pressures in the NHS.

Arguments about privatisation distract from the much more important and damaging impacts of the reforms on how the NHS is organised and the ability of
its leaders to deal with rapidly growing financial and service pressures. By taking three years to dismantle the old structures and reassemble them into new ones,
the government took scarce time and expertise away from efforts to address these pressures.

In any organisation, restructures divert people’s energy away from other activities. Shortly after the proposals were published, the right-leaning think tank Civitas warned the government that a drop in performance was likely with a reorganisation of this scale. Eighteen months in, the Commons Health Committee found that the disruption and distraction caused by the restructure was hindering efficiency savings.

The organisation that emerged from this upheaval is, says the Kings Fund, more complicated than the one it replaced.

The complexity of the new structures that resulted from the 2012 Act has proved equally damaging. An unwieldy organisation has emerged from debates on the reforms and compromises made along the way in what can best be likened to
a Heath Robinson construct.

All of which makes increases in productivity even less likely.

In any case, productivity improvement in service organisations is no easy task. This Bank of England report showed that, in the decade before the recession, the UK private service sector improved productivity by 2.3 percent per year. That was unusually high by international standards and, along with the rest of the economy, its productivity has stalled since the recession. Given this, the recent history of NHS productivity gains and the damaging effects of the recent re-organisation, surely annual productivity growth of 2.4 percent for the next five years is on the outer edge of optimism.

And even under the 2.4 percent scenario, the NHS will still need more money in 2020. The health service faces a smaller scale version of general public spending dilemma. The upward pressure on costs is too great to be met from productivity improvements alone. It therefore needs more funding (which means more taxes or government borrowing) or it will have to stop doing much of what it currently does for free. Neither of these options is likely to be popular but things can’t go on as they are.

A pledge to give the NHS inflation linked budgets is a pledge that it will run out of money by the end of the decade. Sooner or later, something has got to give.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to NHS on course to run out of money by 2020

  1. Jeffery Davies says:

    While atos crapita maximus virgin health salus there are more but these take the nhs monies whilst the nhs is starved lovely isnt it when they have their greedie paws in these tills jeff3

  2. Helen Amery says:

    Thought-provoking post Rick, thank you. I don’t pretend to be an expert in the NHS, or politics for that matter, but I read your post and all through had LEADERSHIP in my head. Or lack of. It’s all about panic, save the current situation, and feels like it has been for years no matter which party’s in charge. It feels like there will be so many opportunities for process improvement to streamline/simplify. It feels like if people were engaged (I know we hate that word, but engaged) in a future that inspired them they could achieve so much improvement without the need for big investments. Marginal gains stuff. The people who work for the NHS want to make a difference, they care about patient experience, they care about that being free. But you know that thing where Performance = Potential minus Interference – well by God the interference in the way for people in there is phenomenal.
    There’s a need for leadership, for a positive vision of how the NHS could be, for involvement of everyone to get there.
    It’s a big old tanker and no one person is going to be able to turn it into calm waters alone.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s