The rise in self-employment: It’s different in London

Interesting morning at the Resolution Foundation on Tuesday for the release of its report on self-employment: Just the Job or a Working Compromise? Its overall conclusion is that some of the rise in self-employment is due to the weak economy but it also reflects a trend that was underway before the recession. A bit of cyclical and a bit of structural.

The regional data suggest that self-employment has increased where unemployment has increased, though the correlation is weak.

The trend on Figure 15 is too weak to conclude any clear relationship between unemployment and self- employment, and the international evidence for such a relationship, discussed in the previous chapter, is mixed. However, we can certainly conclude that self-employment growth is not correlated with strengthening labour markets at the regional level, and observe that self-employment has frequently held up or grown in places where employee jobs have fallen and unemployment has risen.

Screen Shot 2014-05-07 at 12.56.39

In some regions, self-employment has kept the overall employment figures up and there still has not been a net increase in the number of employees since the recession.

Screen Shot 2014-05-07 at 13.18.14

As luck would have it, the ONS Economic Review, published last week, also has some useful data on employment and self-employment by region. It breaks the post recession period into two so we can see what happened immediately after the recession and more recently.

In the three years after the recession, it was self-employment that mitigated the fall in employment almost everywhere.

Screen Shot 2014-05-05 at 17.30.56

In the last two years, most of the rise in employment has been due to increases in the number of employees, apart from in the North West. At the same time, self-employment has continued to rise. In some regions, it rose by more between 2011 and 2013 than in the previous three years.

Screen Shot 2014-05-05 at 17.35.35

Many regions are still not back to pre-recession employment levels and, for those that are, at least half of this is due to self-employment. Only the Eastern region has seen more of an increase in the number of employees than those in self-employment.

Here is where it gets more interesting though. Workforce Jobs surveys employers and therefore holds data on where the jobs are located, rather than where people live. This chart, again from the Resolution Foundation, shows that most of the net increase in employed jobs has been in London. Much of the rise in the number employees in the East region must therefore be due to people living in that region but commuting into London. Beyond the M25, it seems, self-employment is still the main cause of the rise in employment levels.

Screen Shot 2014-05-07 at 13.51.33


It gets more interesting still, though. Yesterday, Michael O’Connor lobbed this chart, based on Labour Force Survey data, into the mix.


This shows rises and falls in more or less the same places as the other data but shows non-UK born taking the lion’s share of the increase in employed jobs almost everywhere. In London, they account for all the net increase in self-employment.

You might expect this in London, given that it has a high proportion of foreign-born residents anyway and it tends to be where people from overseas head when they are looking for work.

That said, the non UK-born have been a significant component of the increase in self-employment in some other regions too. Michael goes into this in more detail on his blog but, in summary, the LFS figures show non-UK born people accounting for around 40 percent of the net increase in working age self-employment across the country.


So now we have another question. Not just whether, and by how much, the rise in self-employment is cyclical or structural. It’s also why so much of it has been due to non UK-born people setting up businesses.

I must admit to being very surprised by Michael’s findings. I suspect some of the increase in the number of non UK-born self-employed  is due to the relative lack of regulation in the UK, making it that much easier to set up in business here. I discussed this in a post a couple of years ago and will do an update on it at some point.

In the meantime, though, it’s another one of those ‘damned if I know’ posts. Hypotheses, suggestions, and random thoughts in the usual place please.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The rise in self-employment: It’s different in London

  1. Interesting stats. Just a small part of the picture. Before my rent on a noisy shoe-box priced me out of London, I worked for Royal Mail for 17 years. In the last 5 years the new intake only comprised new migrants. Previous to that the mix had been virtually all native born, with an ethnic mix of roughly white to other of two to one. About fifty percent of the migrants were African ( and good workers too. But that is not the point. The previous workers were good workers too, as our office had been rated one of the most efficient in London twenty years ago.) Now that is just one office, but the workforce was employed from elsewhere, so it is likely some policy was being followed here. I was told Royal Mail was exercising a “quota” but it is next to impossible to find information on it. Like why the operation of the apparent quota did not appear to include a quota for native born, of all ethnic groups.

  2. sk says:

    Perhaps UK born population is more street-wise and is leaving london in order to get away from the impact of high housing costs?
    While as you mentioned, new non-UK entrants will always move to London (due to other friends/better possibility of finding jobs etc) and try to make ends meet. Whether this is sustainable in the long term if costs keep rising, wages are stagnant is interesting to see..

  3. Immigrant populations have always tended to be self-employed. They find it harder to get jobs, and they tend to be more driven and hard-working people – desperate refugees aside, people emigrate to “better themselves”. This makes self employment comparatively more attractive.

    Immigrants are not typical of the populations they come from. For example, the number of South Asian owned small businesses in the UK hardly reflects the strong South Asian bias towards having a “proper job” preferable with a big company in a stable business. I know from first hand experience in Sri Lanka, and I am told it is true in India, that self employment is regarded as little different from unemployment, particularly if you work from home. A few professions are exempt (such as lawyers) and if you employ others that moves that puts you in the entirely different category of business own, but for most people self-employment means a loss of prestige and “marriageability”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s