It’s a bit late to be “toughest in the world”.

Suddenly, and somewhat belatedly, Gordon Brown is getting all macho with the banks. Apparently, he’s going to make the UK’s bank regulation the toughest in the world. That will certainly play well to the Labour faithful and a public heartily pissed off with investment bankers.

 But hang on a minute, wasn’t the whole point of the G20 summit, and all the consensus-building which led up to it, to make sure that all countries have legislation that is equally tough? Isn’t the idea of global agreements on regulation about preventing bankers playing us off against each other by threatening to relocate? Shouldn’t Gordon be saying “our regulation is going to be just as tough as everyone else’s” ?

OK, the phrase doesn’t have the same ring to it and it wouldn’t sound as good in a speech. Surely, though, we don’t want to make trouble for ourselves by lurching suddenly from being one of the word’s most de-regulated banking markets to one of it’s most restricted.

This sounds very much like Gordon trying to make up for lost time. He knows now that too little regulation was a mistake and he’s trying to make amends. The trouble is, of course, it’s now too late. To stretch an analogy, he’s shutting the stable door and barring it with dozens of high-security locks, long after the horse disappeared over the horizon with most of our money.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to It’s a bit late to be “toughest in the world”.

  1. freethinkingeconomist says:

    I don’t know whether you read the Baseline Scenario. Here they come out with quite an odd reason not to worry about coordination

    http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/26/was-the-g20-summit-actually-dangerous/

    “As we discovered over the past 12 months, undercapitalized finance is not a good thing – it is profoundly dangerous and expensive. . . . But stop worrying about what other countries might or might not do. Establish high capital requirements in the US, and make this a beacon for safe and productive finance. And prepare for the crises that will sweep undercapitalized parts of the world financial system in the years to come.”

    In other words, the next crisis will be so bad that there will no longer be even a selfish advantage to shopping around for low capital requirements. The next country to have an undercapitalized system will go down in flames.

    Kind of optimistic-pessimistic . . . .

  2. jameshigham says:

    The whole point of Gordo and Labour is to dismantle the middle-class.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s