I was wrong about those pay cuts

The equal pay cases are still coming thick and fast. In the last couple of weeks, Sunderland and Cumbria councils have found themselves facing huge bills to cover the successful legal claims brought by female workers. A case is due to be heard against Falkirk council soon.

A major problem for employers who lose equal pay cases is that the law requires them to harmonise pay immediately. Actually, it’s even worse than that. They have to harmonise pay six years ago by giving back-pay to the women who have won their cases.

Of course, the alternative to bringing one group’s pay up to the level of the other would be to cut the wages of the higher-paid group, thus harmonising the pay downwards.

When this issue first made headlines a couple of years ago, I ridiculed the suggestion that councils might cut pay to bring about equality, rather than throwing more money at the problem and pushing up taxes and borrowing in the process. I was at least partially right. Local councils have had to borrow extra money and seek bailouts from central government to meet the costs.

But now, it seems, as there is less cash in the public sector pot to draw on, some councils are cutting wages in response to equal pay claims. Aberdeen City Council has downgraded workers in predominantly male roles and Rochdale is cutting the pay of a quarter of its employees, to comply with equal pay legislation. Unions in Glasgow are calling for strike action over a similar proposal by the city council there.  

Unison, the public sector union, predicts more of the same as cash strapped councils try to comply with the law while avoiding massive payouts. A spokesman told the Guardian:

We estimate that 56% of councils have undertaken and implemented pay reviews in response. It has been very contentious – there are going to be more disputes to come.

It’s a bitter irony that legislation designed to bring low paid female workers up to the same pay levels as their male colleagues is now leading to pay cuts, for both men and women, throughout the local government sector.

So it looks as if I am going to have to eat my words. I was wrong. Some councils have started cutting pay and it looks as though more will follow.

Who’d have thought it, eh? The next thing you know, those pigs really will be flying over City Hall.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to I was wrong about those pay cuts

  1. Happy Homeworker says:

    Some years ago I worked in local government until I could stand it no longer. One thing that is never mentioned in these discussions is that the unions themselves created the situation, by creating pay structures which led to men being given more pay than women, but in an opaque way. It was a deliberate policy in the bad old misogynist days.

    I think cutting pay in these situations is probably the only way, and long overdue. Of course, they could also cut out all the overtime men do (rarely done by women), which was again fostered by the unions – that would save millions. Where else could an unskilled worker with no qualifications earn over £25k? I was frankly astonished at the pay levels of male manual workers, and disgusted by the unwillingness of the unions to support their female members. This is chickens coming home to roost, in my opinion.

  2. jonathan says:

    From your Rochdale link Rick, this bit made me laugh outloud (a lot)

    Council bosses also had to apologise to staff after some of them were given the news a day early because of an administrative error.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s